Delphi to C++ Builder Migration Checklist — Tools, Tips, and Pitfalls


1. Assess the project and define scope

  • Inventory code and assets:
    • Identify Delphi source files (.pas, .dfm/.fmx, .dproj), resources, third-party components, and build scripts.
    • Flag UI frameworks used (VCL vs FireMonkey).
  • Determine migration goals:
    • Full rewrite vs incremental porting vs interoperability (mixed-language project).
    • Target C++ Builder version and compiler (RAD Studio version).
  • Evaluate risk and timeline:
    • Identify mission-critical modules and create a priority list.
    • Estimate effort per module and plan a pilot project.

2. Choose a migration approach

  • Full conversion:
    • Translate all Delphi code to native C++ Builder C++ code. Best for long-term uniformity but most effort.
  • Incremental porting:
    • Convert modules gradually, use interop layers to call Pascal from C++ or vice versa.
  • Interoperability (mixed-language):
    • Keep stable Delphi units and expose interfaces usable by C++ Builder (DLLs, packages, COM).

3. Tools and utilities

  • C++ Builder IDE (RAD Studio) — required to build and debug converted projects.
  • Delphi-to-C++ conversion helpers:
    • Built-in C++ Builder header generation for Delphi packages (creates C++ headers from Pascal units).
    • Third-party converters and scripts (use cautiously; often require manual fixes).
  • Version control (Git) — create a migration branch and tag milestones.
  • Build automation — adopt or adapt existing CI to handle both Pascal and C++ builds.
  • Static analyzers and linters for C++ (e.g., clang-tidy) to enforce code quality after conversion.
  • Binary diff tools (beyond compare) to verify resource and form parity.

4. Project setup in C++ Builder

  • Create a new C++ Builder project matching original project structure.
  • Import forms:
    • VCL .dfm files can be used by C++ Builder; ensure form streaming compatibility.
    • For FireMonkey, check .fmx compatibility between Delphi and C++ Builder versions.
  • Convert project options (compiler defines, search paths, packages).
  • Recreate packages: Delphi packages may require rebuilding or wrapping as C++ packages.

5. Language and code translation checklist

  • Basic syntax:
    • Translate Pascal constructs to C++ equivalents: procedures/functions → functions/methods; records → structs/classes.
    • Pay attention to case sensitivity (C++ is case-sensitive; Object Pascal is not).
  • Data types:
    • Map common types: Integer/LongInt → int32_t or appropriate C++ integral types; Cardinal → uint32_t.
    • Strings: Delphi’s UnicodeString ↔ C++ Builder’s UnicodeString (VCL) or std::wstring/std::u16string depending on use.
    • Enumerations: ensure exact integer sizing if binary compatibility is required.
  • Memory management:
    • Delphi’s automatic reference counting for certain types differs from C++ manual management. Use smart pointers (std::unique_ptr/std::shared_ptr) or C++ Builder RTL utilities where appropriate.
  • Interfaces and COM:
    • Delphi interfaces vs C++ abstract classes — ensure reference-counting semantics are preserved.
  • Exception handling:
    • Convert try..except/try..finally to try/catch and RAII patterns (std::lock_guard, destructors) for cleanup.
  • Events and method pointers:
    • Delphi method pointers (TNotifyEvent) map to C++ method pointers or std::function; C++ Builder provides compatibility types — prefer the latter when integrating with VCL.
  • Properties:
    • Pascal properties have no direct C++ language equivalent; implement via getter/setter methods or C++ Builder property extensions.

6. UI and component migration

  • VCL:
    • VCL is supported in C++ Builder; many components and .dfm forms are usable directly, but event handler signatures and form unit names will change.
    • Relink event handlers after conversion; adjust __fastcall calling conventions if needed.
  • FireMonkey:
    • FMX compatibility is generally good but verify platform-specific behavior.
  • Third-party components:
    • Check availability of C++ Builder versions of components. If none exist, consider:
      • Keeping the component as a Delphi package and using interop.
      • Replacing with alternative components.
      • Rewriting component functionality in C++.
  • Resources and images:
    • Ensure resource (.res) files and image assets are included and paths updated.

  • Resolve symbol and linker issues:
    • Name mangling and calling conventions can cause unresolved externals; use extern “C” for C-style exports or adjust linkage settings.
  • Library compatibility:
    • Rebuild any static libraries from source for the C++ toolchain; avoid mixing Delphi-compiled binaries unless explicitly supported.
  • Runtime tests:
    • Run unit tests, integration tests, and UI smoke tests after each converted module.
  • Memory and performance profiling:
    • Use profilers to detect regressions introduced during conversion.

8. Data storage and serialization

  • Binary formats:
    • If you need binary compatibility with existing files/databases, ensure data type sizes, packing, and endianness match.
    • Reproduce Delphi record layouts with explicit packing directives (#pragma pack) and integer typedefs.
  • Object streaming:
    • VCL form streaming differences can break load/save — test form streaming especially when mixing Delphi and C++ Builder modules.
  • Database access:
    • Update database components (dbExpress, FireDAC, third-party) and connection strings; test query results for type mapping differences.

9. Testing strategy

  • Create a test matrix:
    • Unit tests for translated logic.
    • GUI tests for forms and workflows.
    • Regression tests for file formats and APIs.
  • Automate tests in CI:
    • Run builds and tests on merge to migration branches.
  • Acceptance criteria:
    • Define pass/fail conditions per module (e.g., performance within X%, binary compatibility, feature parity).

10. Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

  • Assuming 1:1 language features — many constructs need redesign rather than direct translation.
  • Ignoring calling conventions — leads to crashes; verify __fastcall, STDCALL, cdecl as needed.
  • Overlooking Unicode/string behavior — test all string I/O and UI text.
  • Third-party component gaps — inventory and plan replacements early.
  • Memory leaks and ownership differences — adopt smart pointers and RAII patterns.
  • Build configuration drift — keep compiler and linker settings consistent with original behavior where compatibility matters.

11. Practical tips

  • Start with a non-critical pilot module to refine the process.
  • Keep Delphi code compilable during migration to allow quick rollback.
  • Maintain clear interface boundaries between converted and original modules to minimize integration friction.
  • Use automated refactoring tools in the IDE for repetitive renames and signature updates.
  • Document translation conventions (type mappings, naming rules, resource handling) so the team applies consistent patterns.

12. Post-migration checklist

  • Full regression test pass completed.
  • Performance and memory profiling acceptable.
  • All third-party components either migrated, replaced, or wrapped.
  • CI adjusted to build and test the new C++ project.
  • Documentation updated (developer setup, build steps, runtimes).
  • Retirement plan for old Delphi-only branches.

Quick reference: common Delphi → C++ type mappings

Delphi C++ Builder / C++
Integer / LongInt int32_t (or int)
Cardinal uint32_t
SmallInt int16_t
Byte uint8_t
Boolean bool
String / UnicodeString UnicodeString (VCL) or std::wstring
Char wchar_t (or char16_t depending on use)
TObject TObject (C++ Builder RTL) or base C++ class
TList / TObjectList TList equivalents or std::vector/std::list

Migrating from Delphi to C++ Builder is achievable with careful planning, a strong testing regimen, and attention to language and runtime differences. Follow this checklist, run a pilot, and iterate — the hardest part is organizational and architectural, not just syntax.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *