IVPN Client vs. Competitors: Which VPN Client Is Right for You?Choosing the right VPN client means balancing privacy, performance, features, ease of use, and price. This article compares the IVPN client with several well-known competitors to help you decide which VPN client best fits your needs. We’ll cover privacy and security, protocol support, ease of setup and user experience, performance, advanced features, pricing, and who each client is best for.
What to look for in a VPN client
Before comparing products, keep these priorities in mind:
- Privacy & logging policy — Does the provider keep logs that could identify you?
- Security & protocols — Are strong cryptographic protocols and modern features (like WireGuard, multi-hop, or RAM-only servers) available?
- Jurisdiction — Is the provider located in a country with strong privacy laws or one that participates in intelligence-sharing alliances?
- Performance — Real-world speed and latency for browsing, streaming, and torrenting.
- Ease of use — Installation, apps for desktop and mobile, UI clarity.
- Advanced features — Split tunneling, kill switch, obfuscation, port forwarding, static IPs, multi-hop, and client-side controls.
- Transparency & audits — Independent audits, open-source clients, and public transparency reports.
Overview: IVPN Client (short summary)
IVPN is a privacy-focused VPN service emphasizing minimal logging, multi-hop routing, and strong technical defaults. The IVPN client is available on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android, supports WireGuard and OpenVPN, and offers features like a kill switch, split tunneling (on some platforms), and multi-hop (called “double hop”). IVPN positions itself as a choice for privacy-conscious users who want straightforward apps and strong policies.
Competitors covered
- Proton VPN
- Mullvad
- NordVPN
- Surfshark
- ExpressVPN
Privacy & Logging
- IVPN: No logs of user activity and minimal connection metadata; operates with a privacy-first policy and offers anonymous account options (payment via cash/crypto). Jurisdiction: Gibraltar (note: IVPN historically based in Gibraltar — verify current jurisdiction on their site).
- Mullvad: No-logs and highly privacy-focused, uses anonymous account numbers, accepts cash and crypto.
- Proton VPN: No-logs; strong Swiss jurisdiction and ties to Proton Mail increase its privacy credibility.
- NordVPN: No-logs policy and has undergone independent audits, but headquartered in Panama — good jurisdiction for privacy.
- Surfshark: No-logs policy with audits, based in the Netherlands; offers many features but is younger than some rivals.
- ExpressVPN: No-logs audited, headquartered in the British Virgin Islands; established large server network.
If privacy is the primary concern, Mullvad and Proton VPN are often highlighted as the most privacy-purist, with IVPN closely aligned as a strong contender.
Security & Protocols
- IVPN: Supports WireGuard (fast, modern) and OpenVPN; offers multi-hop (double hop) and a robust kill switch. Client code has portions open-sourced in the past — check current repo status for latest transparency.
- Mullvad: Early and strong WireGuard implementation; client and server code have been open-sourced and audited.
- Proton VPN: Supports WireGuard and OpenVPN, plus proprietary Secure Core (multi-hop through privacy-friendly countries).
- NordVPN: Supports WireGuard (branded as NordLynx) and OpenVPN; offers Double VPN (multi-hop) and advanced threat protection features.
- Surfshark: WireGuard and OpenVPN; multi-hop (called MultiHop) and obfuscation tools.
- ExpressVPN: Uses its Lightway protocol (designed for speed and reliability) and supports OpenVPN and WireGuard on many platforms.
If you want the most modern protocol with strong performance, WireGuard (or equivalents like Lightway/NordLynx) is recommended. IVPN provides WireGuard and solid defaults.
Performance & Reliability
- IVPN: Good speeds on WireGuard; smaller network compared with giants, which can mean less congestion on given servers but fewer location choices.
- Mullvad: Consistently strong speeds and low overhead; smaller but well-managed network.
- Proton VPN: Competitive speeds, especially on paid tiers and Secure Core routes (which may add latency).
- NordVPN: Large global network optimized for speed; consistently high benchmark results.
- Surfshark: Generally strong performance given price; many servers help reduce load.
- ExpressVPN: Known for consistently high speeds and reliable connections worldwide.
For raw global speed and server-location breadth, NordVPN and ExpressVPN typically lead, while IVPN and Mullvad perform excellently in privacy-focused tests.
Ease of Use & Platforms
- IVPN: Clean, minimal UI focused on privacy; apps for major desktop and mobile platforms, plus manual setup instructions for routers. Some advanced features are platform-dependent.
- Mullvad: Simple, no-friction apps; Linux-friendly with good command-line tools.
- Proton VPN: Polished apps with helpful UI and additional features like secure core and streaming profiles.
- NordVPN: User-friendly apps with many extras and one-click features.
- Surfshark: Intuitive apps and unlimited simultaneous connections make it easy for families.
- ExpressVPN: Very approachable apps and one of the best router integrations.
If you want the easiest out-of-the-box experience with lots of extras, NordVPN, Proton VPN, and ExpressVPN are strong choices. For those who prefer minimal interfaces and strong Linux support, IVPN and Mullvad shine.
Advanced Features
- IVPN:
- Multi-hop (double hop).
- Kill switch and leak protection.
- Split tunneling (platform-dependent).
- Obfuscation options for restrictive networks.
- Mullvad:
- Port forwarding (on certain servers).
- WireGuard key-based accounts and advanced routing options.
- Proton VPN:
- Secure Core (extra-hop through privacy-friendly countries).
- Tor over VPN.
- Malware/protector features.
- NordVPN:
- Double VPN, Threat Protection, Meshnet (remote network access).
- Specialty servers for P2P, Onion over VPN.
- Surfshark:
- MultiHop, CleanWeb (ad/malware blocking), unlimited devices.
- ExpressVPN:
- Split tunneling, streaming-optimized servers, proprietary Lightway protocol.
For multi-hop and extra routing control, IVPN, Proton VPN, and NordVPN offer strong options. For extras like mesh networking or built-in ad/malware blocking, NordVPN and Surfshark provide more consumer-oriented features.
Pricing & Value
- IVPN: Mid-range pricing; supports anonymous payments. Focused on privacy rather than huge discounts or extras.
- Mullvad: Simple flat-rate pricing per month; attractive for privacy-focused buyers wanting predictable costs.
- Proton VPN: Free tier available; paid tiers scale up to include Secure Core and higher speeds.
- NordVPN: Frequently discounted yearly plans; broad feature set for the price.
- Surfshark: Aggressive pricing and unlimited device connections.
- ExpressVPN: Premium pricing but often justified by speed and reliability.
If budget is the main constraint, Surfshark and Mullvad often offer the best price-to-privacy ratio; if you want premium global performance, ExpressVPN or NordVPN may be worth the cost. IVPN targets users willing to pay for stronger privacy practices without corporate bloat.
Transparency, Audits & Trust
- IVPN: Strong transparency stance and prior third-party interactions; check current audit status for latest details.
- Mullvad: Open-source components and independent audits; highly transparent.
- Proton VPN: Regular transparency reporting and Swiss legal protection.
- NordVPN: Completed independent audits and public transparency reports after past incidents.
- Surfshark: Completed audits and improving transparency.
- ExpressVPN: Underwent independent audits for no-logs policy and apps.
For audit-backed, open-source trustworthiness, Mullvad and Proton VPN are standout choices; IVPN is close behind.
Comparison Table
| Category | IVPN | Mullvad | Proton VPN | NordVPN | Surfshark | ExpressVPN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logging policy | No logs | No logs | No logs | No logs | No logs | No logs |
| Jurisdiction | Gibraltar (privacy-focused) | Sweden (transparent) | Switzerland (strong) | Panama (privacy-friendly) | Netherlands | British Virgin Islands |
| WireGuard | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes (NordLynx) | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-hop | Yes | Limited | Yes (Secure Core) | Yes (Double VPN) | Yes | No (limited) |
| Open-source / Audits | Some transparency | Open-source & audited | Audits & reports | Audited | Audited | Audited |
| Best for | Privacy-first users | Maximum privacy & openness | Privacy + ecosystem | Speed & features | Value & unlimited devices | Speed & reliability |
| Price positioning | Mid | Flat & low-mid | Free tier + paid | Competitive (discounted) | Low-cost | Premium |
Which is right for you?
- Choose IVPN if: you prioritize a privacy-first client with minimal defaults, anonymous payment options, multi-hop routing, and clean apps across platforms.
- Choose Mullvad if: maximum privacy anonymity, open-source ethos, and predictable flat pricing are your priorities.
- Choose Proton VPN if: you want strong privacy with a free tier, Swiss jurisdiction, and unique Secure Core multi-hop routing.
- Choose NordVPN if: you want a large, fast server network with many extra features (streaming, Meshnet) and polished apps.
- Choose Surfshark if: you need a low-cost option with unlimited simultaneous connections and consumer-friendly features.
- Choose ExpressVPN if: you want the most consistent global performance and a premium, highly reliable experience.
Final notes
Test drives matter: take advantage of free trials, money-back guarantees, or free tiers to test real-world speeds, streaming access, and the client behavior on your devices. Configuring a VPN for your specific use (torrenting, streaming, remote work, bypassing censorship) may change which provider fits best.
If you want, I can:
- Recommend the best choice for a specific use case (streaming, torrents, bypassing censorship, enterprise remote access).
- Provide setup steps for IVPN or any competitor on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, or routers.
Leave a Reply